Home
News
Arts & Leisure
Sports
Business
Opinion
Dining
Gardening
Travel
Classifieds
Jobs
Community
Events
Forums
TV Listings
|
Community
 |
 |
|
SEDONA ROADRUNNER
driver tallies passengers on a manual counter as they board a shuttle in Uptown. Some community members believe rider counts may be inaccurate, unfairly justifying the system. |
Sedona RoadRunner: Making it count
Transit officials seek commission members
Story and photos by Cyndy Hardy
SEDONA, AZ – June 23, 2008 – Public suspicion of how
Sedona RoadRunner transit system riders are counted
ranges from fudged numbers to fancy gadgets that
count a rider twice by electronically scanning both
legs when a rider boards the shuttle.
A recent two-hour ride on a Thursday afternoon to
investigate these claims proved anticlimactic
regarding the gadgetry; however, there may be reason
to believe counts are sometimes inaccurate.
“I suspect many of the people who use the bus get on
and off several times,” said resident Carol Wirkus
in a June 6 email.
“For example, a tourist might board in Uptown, and
then get off at both Tlaquepaque arts & crafts
village and Hillside Sedona, before returning to
Uptown. I also suspect riders are counted as they
board the bus, which means this example of a single
rider would be counted as three passengers during
his or her one round trip bus ride,” Ms. Wirkus
said.
According to this reporter’s observations, riders
are recorded manually by the shuttle drivers on a
series of 10 counters, reminiscent of pre-electronic
cash registers. There is one counter for each major
bus stop on the route.
As each passenger boards the shuttle, the driver
clicks the counter and each hour the counts are
transferred to a paper tally sheet which is filed at
the end of the day, according to one driver, whose
name is withheld.
The counting system is subject to human error.
“Sometimes I forget to count,” the driver said. As
people boarded during this ride, many had questions
about the city, the shuttle service and local
attractions, which the driver answered jovially,
sometimes not entering the rider counts until
everyone was seated.
When there is heavy pedestrian traffic, riders
simultaneously enter through the front and back
doors of the shuttle as others step off. “It’s hard
to count them all,” the driver said.
One man stepped aboard the shuttle at the Uptown
municipal parking lot to ask the driver about the
shuttle service hours. The man stepped off the
shuttle with an answer and a RoadRunner brochure.
“Do I count him?” the driver asked rhetorically. He
did, stating the RoadRunner administration has no
clear guidelines for counting such an incident, but
the driver considered he had “served this guest
while the man was on the bus.”
On the return trip about 20 minutes later, the man
reboarded with three companions who had no
destination in mind – they just wanted to ride the
shuttle around to see the city.
And yes, he was counted again, at which those who
say officials are double-dipping the counts may find
fuel to their fire.
 |
|
FORTY-PLUS TOURISTS
rode the Sedona RoadRunner circulator shuttle during a recent two-hour investigation into perceived ridership count inaccuracies |
But while the driver’s judgment on this count may be
questionable, more than 40 passengers served during
the two-hour investigation were transported. Some
were returning to where they originally boarded the
shuttle.
Transit planners look at ridership just like
transportation planners look at vehicle traffic,
according to Jeff Meilbeck, general manager for the
Northern Arizona Intergovernmental Transportation
Authority; which manages the city transit program.
|
Foresight today is hindsight tomorrow
by Cyndy Hardy
SEDONA, AZ – June 23, 2008 – It
seems the current U.S. fuel-price crisis
has some people rethinking the value of
public transportation. Even more Sedona
workers apparently wish the city’s
transit master plan were a little
further along.
Within days of Mayor Rob Adams’ May 27
attempt to cut the Sedona RoadRunner’s
life expectancy to six months, The
Arizona Republic reported dramatic
increases in commuter ridership on
Phoenix’s public transit systems, driven
by rising fuel costs.
Sedona Red Rock News followed suit in a
June 18 report, citing increased
interest in the city’s Cottonwood
commuter run.
And the Sedona Red Rock News editorial
board has apparently reversed its Oct.
17, 2007 position that the Sedona City
Council should axe the city transit
system and “just buy everyone a cup of
coffee” – a jab at what the paper
estimated costs taxpayers about $5 per
person per year.
In its Friday, June 20 editorial the
paper stated the commuter shuttle
between Cottonwood and Sedona is a good
start, but that transit decision makers
need to increase service for commuters
in the face of rising fuel costs.
Perhaps hindsight is 20/20; or maybe it
takes a crisis to see the foresight past
council members had when they adopted
the transit master plan in accordance
with nearly 10 years of public input.
The master plan is a three-phased plan
to eventually connect public transit in
Sedona with Cottonwood, the Village of
Oak Creek, and Oak Creek Canyon –
connecting with Flagstaff’s public
transit system. Each phase is contingent
on ridership and funding benchmarks.
Logistical and legal problems – and some
say politics – changed the plan’s
original first phase from service to
West Sedona, which would have been more
accessible and useful to local residents
and workers, to a circulator shuttle
route in the commercial district between
Uptown and the Hillside shops on Hwy.
179 that mainly benefits tourists.
The city transit vehicles are housed in
Cottonwood, so the commuter run is
essentially a rideshare program that
serves a handful of Sedona’s
approximately 60 percent non-resident
workforce.
Ironically, perhaps, one RoadRunner
shuttle driver who lives in Sedona said
he recently purchased a motorcycle to
save on gas costs for his daily commute
to Cottonwood, where he picks up a
shuttle to return to Sedona.
The commuter run is gaining popularity,
as gas prices continue to sap the
paychecks of those who can’t afford to
live in Sedona.
“Most don’t know about it – [RoadRunner
management] doesn’t market it. But now,
with gas prices, commuters are looking
for alternatives,” the shuttle driver
said.
© 2008 Cyndy Hardy. This article may
not be reproduced, republished or
distributed without written permission
from the author. Contact the author at
cyndyhardy@msn.com.
|
“Just like car trips, every one-way trip is
counted,” Mr. Meilbeck said. “Think about it, when a
car drives into Sedona to visit Uptown, it counts as
one trip. When the car drives to Hillside for lunch,
it is another trip. Transit is no different.”
This paradigm is a hard-sell to local naysayers.
Sedona Mayor Rob Adams and others in the community
have questioned both the validity of the rider
counts and whether the benchmarks were properly set.
Mr. Adams tried to divert six months of city funding
for the transit system on May 27. His effort lacked
council support; however, newly-seated council
members may reconsider his plan in the future.
If the council does scrutinize the RoadRunner, it
will certainly look at cost/benefit data, with which
some in the community find fault.
“We hear cost figures that I doubt are complete,”
Ms. Wirkus said. “What is the real cost per rider on
the bus? If a single rider making a round trip is
counted three times – and it could easily be more
than three times – what is the cost per rider?”
Transit costs are calculated per trip, not per
rider, according to Mr. Meilbeck. The formula is to
divide the annual budget by the annual ridership, he
said.
The current cost per trip is about $7.48, including
the commuter route; which covers expenses such as
fuel, maintenance, repairs, liability insurance,
utilities, grant management, planning, and current
facilities, he said.
The figure does not include about $500,000 NAIPTA
estimates to build a new shuttle storage facility in
Cottonwood. The Sedona City Council has not bought
off on that project. And building costs are
amortized – not included in cost-per-trip
calculations, Mr. Meilbeck said.
Flagstaff’s Mountain Line transit system operates at
about $3.28 per trip, according to Mr. Meilbeck. The
RoadRunner’s cost per trip is higher than
anticipated for two main reasons: the cost of
bio-diesel fuel and the cost of doing repairs and
maintenance on the shuttles, he said.
“Holding down costs and increasing ridership results
in a more efficient system and the RoadRunner needs
to find those efficiencies,” Mr. Meilbeck said.
Despite public perception that the shuttles often
run empty, transit official and some city officials
say Phase One has met the benchmarks and exceeded
ridership projections, citing more than 80,000
served in its inaugural year, according to official
documents.
The main obstacle to Phase Two, which includes
increased service to West Sedona and possibly
additional commuter service, is federal funding,
according to officials.
“RoadRunner has been a success in that we did what
set out to do, however, I believe we can do better
and look forward to engaging the community,” Mr.
Meilbeck said.
NAIPTA is seeking applicants who represent economic,
educational, social and cultural diversity for a new
public transportation advisory commission, according
to a NAIPTA press release.
Commission members will participate in a series of
seven meetings between mid-August and mid-October,
requiring approximately 20 to 30 hours of
attendance, to evaluate the performance of the
RoadRunner and make recommendations to the NAIPTA
Board of Directors and the Sedona City Council
before December 31, 2008.
Those interested in serving on the commission should
email Mr. Meilbeck at
jmeilbeck@naipta.az.gov.
© 2008 Cyndy Hardy. This article may not be
reproduced, republished or distributed without
written permission from the author. Contact the
author at
cyndyhardy@msn.com.
Related articles:
Sedona RoadRunner dodges
death-by-budget
Sedona RoadRunner thriving; needs more cash to grow
[Home Page]
[News Home Page]
[Back to Community Page] |