 |
|
Sedona
KSB President Steve DeVol addresses NSA Rally. |
NSA Rally Packs
Sedona Elks Club
More than 300
show support for National Area Scenic Designation
By Tommy Acosta
SEDONA, AZ (July 23, 2009) - Members of Keep
Sedona Beautiful, the Sedona Sierra Club and the
Democrats of the Red Rocks turned out in force
Wednesday, July 22 to rally behind an effort to
designate Sedona as a National Scenic Area.
More than 300 community members gathered at the Elks
Club in Sedona to voice support for the designation,
which would effectively and permanently ban land
swaps between the federal government and other
property owners, except within the designated scenic
area itself.
One hundred sixty
thousand acres of Coconino National Forest currently
surround Sedona, The Village of Oak Creek, and Big
Park.
They are protected from land trades by Amendment 12
but revisions to the current forest plan which
protects the Sedona area against land trades is now
underway and may be in place as early as 2011,
according to D.O.R.R. A National Scenic Area
designation would make the policy of no land
trades within the Amendment 12 area
permanent.
 |
|
More than 300 community residents attended NSA rally. |
“The designation has only one purpose – to prevent
land trades from outside the designated area for
land inside the designated area,” said KSB President
Steve DeVol. “That’s it!”
Opponents of an NSA designation for Sedona argue
that it would create a new layer of government,
affect private property rights and eliminate local
control over forest land, which is presently
controlled by the Forest Service under the auspices
of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Mr. DeVol contested the arguments.
“I’d like to make a couple of points of
clarification this evening,” he said. “The scenic
area designation does not bring a new layer of
government. This is a myth. The Forest Service is
administered by the US Department of Agriculture
already and the management plan will remain the
same. Control of the area will remain in local hands
as it has been and will continue. Nothing changes.
Except no land exchanges! Private property rights
are not affected and are preserved. Private property
can be bought and sold exactly as it is today.”
According to Mr. DeVol, the NSA Coalition is
comprised of the Democrats of the Red Rocks, the
Sierra Club Sedona-Verde Valley, and Keep Sedona
Beautiful.
 |
|
D.O.R.R. President Angela LeFevre speaks on NSA. |
He said they collected more than 3,500 statements of
support urging Sen. John McCain, Senator Jon Kyl and
Congresswoman Kirkpatrick to introduce the
Sedona-Red Rock National Scenic Area legislation
into Congress this year.
D.O.R.R. President Angela LeFevre noted that
Senators McCain and Kyl have stated that they will
support the bill when Representative Ann Kirkpatrick
introduces it.
She said Rep. Kirkpatrick ran on a campaign promise
to support an NSA designation and that D.O.R.R.
delivered 6,000 votes for her in the last election.
She said her organization worked very hard to elect
the congresswoman and she wondered why she was
seeking input from the community to support the
designation when she promised during the campaign
she would support it.
“”So now we have Ann (Rep. Kirkpatrick) settled into
life in Washington D.C. and our hopes are high,” she
said of the election. “And we waited and we hear
nothing. Ann was being curiously non-committal about
the issue despite the fact that this had been a
strong campaign promise of hers.”
 |
|
Sedona Sierra Club President Marlene Raynor makes a point. |
She said she was concerned as to why they now had to
convince the congresswoman to support the NSA
designation
“Why should we need to convince Ann of the necessity
for an NSA when she has already pledged to support a
designation?” she said. “We are all hoping that Ann
will hear us and listen to our voices, honor the
pledges she gave to the Democrats, Republicans and
Independents here in the Sedona area that she would
support an NSA designation.”
Joe Katz, Congresswoman Kirkpatrick’s press
secretary, said the congresswoman is simply trying
to get all sides of the story before moving forward.
“This is an issue that impacts many people in the
area, and the congresswoman wants input from folks
on both sides of the issue before moving forward,”
he said. “Getting continued feedback from members of
the community is extremely important to the
legislative process, and will allow the
congresswoman to make a better-informed decision on
the next step.”
Ms. LeFevre said the NSA Coalition was formed to
motivate Rep. Kirkpatrick to follow through.
“So D.O.R.R. formed a coalition with KSB and the
Sierra Club,” she said. “We all have the same goal –
to get Ann to introduce legislation that would
designate this beautiful country here as a National
Scenic Area.”
She said the congresswoman’s staff in May finally
contacted her and that Rep. Kirkpatrick was now
ready to look at the NSA issue and needed to start a
“due diligence” process in order to get feedback on
how everyone feels about the NSA designation and the
impact such a designation would have on Greater
Sedona.
“Please send your reasons why you support NSA to Ann
before the end of the month,” she said. ‘July 31 is
the deadline. Send your e-mails and letters. Let’s
make sure that Ann hears us and we make this
happen.”
Steve DeVol said the congresswoman needed additional
facts to justify her introducing the legislation for
the designation.
“Congresswoman Kirkpatrick has sent letters to some
of you asking for additional information about why
we should have the scenic area designation,” he
said. “She is aware of the intrinsic value of
preserving what is here but she wants additional
arguments – facts -- that justify her introducing
this legislation. What would be the financial impact
of decreased tourism? Is there an endangered species
in our forests? What would be the impact if
additional development were allowed in the forest?
Would additional development impact water
availability or our waste treatment plant?
He said contacting elected officials on this was
crucial.
We must encourage our elected officials to do the
right thing,” he said. “Rep. Kirkpatrick needs to
know and needs to hear that "the people" want this
designation.”
Former Sedona Mayor Dick Ellis was there to show
support as well.
“An NSA designation for Sedona is a win/win
situation,” he said. “It cannot hurt us. It can
only do us good. We have a great turnout here today.
It shows the community is interested.”
Community activist Doug Blackwell said he was
concerned only two members of the Sedona City
Council, Mayor Rob Adams and Councilman Mark
DiNunzio showed up at the rally.
“I’m amazed that the majority of the city council did
not show up. It just goes to show how much they
care about Sedona.”
Sedona Times publisher Rita Livingston commended the
community for turning out in such large numbers.
“This is the largest meeting I’ve seen in a long
time,” Ms. Livingston said. “It shows how deep the
support of the community is for an NSA designation
for Sedona.”
Mr. DeVol said action must be taken now to save the
wonder of Sedona.
“The NSA designation will permanently preserve the
land and our irreplaceable scenic beauty, small town
character, and property values while enabling the
community to provide needed schools, roads and other
public necessities in the future,” he said. “We are
at a crucial time in the development of Sedona. As
the U.S. Forest Service begins its revision process
for regional existing Forest Management Plans,
public awareness of the facts and their involvement
are crucial. We need to take action now. This is the
best opportunity we have had in five years to
finally get this done.”
Readers'
comments
#1 I am in agreement with the coalition's agenda
to keep Sedona unspoiled and pristine. I am not
in aggreement as to how the agenda can be
accomplished. Making the NSA designation
permanent would effectively stop the city,
county, and Forest control board from installing
a bridge for an alternate route to Sedona from
the Village of Oak Creek.
A private property owner has already installed a
bridge and made it accessible to emergency
equipment. Under an NSA designation will other
private property owners be able to install
bridges? Can anyone tell me if the NSA
designation is passed, the governing bodies will
be able to someday effect an alternate route? It
is commendable that the coalition has such a
large following and the show of support means
that the citizenry is concerned about
maintaining the beauty of Sedona. I would
heartily support an NSA designation but the
reality of sitting in traffic for over half an
hour just to drive four miles to Sedona from the
village keeps me from doing so.
#2 I find it difficult, if not impossible, to
understand how the argument for an "alternative
route" continues on ad infinitum. How long has
the first respondent been in Sedona? If it
wasn't a long time, didn't they do any research
about the location of their residence in
relation to highways, hospitals and fire
stations before purchasing? Likewise, for those
supporting "affordable dwelling units,"
"workforce housing," or whatever moniker the
City gives it, didn't they research the economy,
or how much of a salary they could make, or
secure a job before moving, or the price of
RENTALS? Why is it assumed that everyone who
moves here wants to buy a house? Some people
prefer renting.
For those who have lived here a long time and
and who continuously want to add yet another
"alternative route" (I believe there are
multiple routes now), I would suggest moving to
a more "urban" area instead of trying to create
one here.
#3 Regarding the other comment, where has this
person been for the last few years. It has been
repeated over and over that the governmental
agencies always have the ability to ask for
Forest property for projects that demonstrate a
community need. That can never go away, it is
the TOWNSITE ACT and has been in existence for
years. The District Forest Ranger has said so
also. That ACT was used to get various
properities in the area and has been in
existence for years. Pay attention people, get
the facts.
Bill Eich
Sedona
#4 No, the Scenic Designation will not prevent
improvements such as an alternate route. Here is
the section of the proposed legislation that
addresses this issue:
(h) NO EFFECT ON SURROUNDING LAND- The
establishment of the Scenic Area does not affect
the management of-
(1) State, municipal, or private land located in
the vicinity of the National Forest System land
that is included in the Scenic area; or
(2) National Forest System land that is not
included in the Scenic Area.
AND:
(j) NO EFFECT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT DISCRETION-
The establishment of the Scenic Area does not
affect the discretion of local governing bodies
(including counties, municipalities, and fire
and school districts) to seek assistance from
the Secretary with respect to the resolution of
local infrastructure and land use issues that
involve National Forest System land within the
Scenic Area.
Currently, any changes with the forest land uses
(such as an alternate route) must comply with a
NEPA Study. Under the Scenic designation, the
same process will apply: a NEPA study must be
conducted. In other words, new roads, hospitals,
cell towers and/or schools are allowed.
Remember, the only thing the National Scenic
designation does is prevent lands trades.
The proposed legislation can be found at:
http://www.keepsedonabeautiful.org/Proposed_NSA_Legislation.pdf
Steve DeVol
#6 I am very encouraged by this show of support
for something we have all been needing for some
time. I have written Ann Kirkpatrick personally
urging she take tangible action on her campaign
promise. I too felt she was somehow knuckling
under to a minority of Red Rock News-influenced
real estate interests fearing possible future
observation and exposure. It's also nice to see
the broadening support, joining often opposite
forces in town to get this done NOW! By all
means let's work together for once to benefit
not only business and property owners today but
future generations to come.
#7 I am commenter #1. In response to commenter
#2, I will state that I am retired and I rent. I
moved from an "urban" area 10 years ago. I am
NOT trying to create anything. I do not want to
be lumped together with all the other categories
#2 has put me in. I know of only one route to
Sedona from the Village. That is 179. Of course
I could go through Cottonwood by way of Beaver
Head Flats and Cornville or I could go up I-17
and come to Sedona on 89A. Or I could move
somewhere else as #2 suggested because I
obviously disagree with this person's opinion of
how things should be. #2: Perhaps the reason you
find it nearly impossible to understand my
position is because you see it as an "arguement"
(sic) instead of just another concerned
citizen's opinion.
In response to commenter #4; Mr. DeVol, thank
you for the information. I will look at the laws
you have referenced and try to resolve my
apprehensions concerning the NSA proposal.
#8 People need to understand that local control
DOES matter and that under the Coconino Forest
Plan we have effectively stopped land exchanges
in the greater Sedona area. Only our own local
diligence and involvement is going to protect us
from land exchanges--not any "Act of Congress."
The current District Ranger recently said that
the Forest Plan now in final approval stage
likely won't be re-opened for 20 years! That
Forest Plan is a far more solid, dependable
public policy than any bill out of Washington,
D.C. If anyone thinks we should trust the 535
people in Congress (in BOTH parties) who take
orders from their Party, not reading the bills,
and watching the lobbyists and special interest
run the place they've got to be kidding
themselves. A bill passed this time can be
reversed when the Congress flips to the other
party. Or the bill can end up coming out with
amendments and changes never expected by
anybody--as they usually do. This Congress has
become notorious for admitting they don't even
know what's IN the bills they are passing.
People, land exchanges are over-done-gone in
this area. Many of us have strong suspicions
about why NSA proponents are crying "WOLF!"
about this but it's just not valid. There is no
need for a new Federal power body here. Local
control is accountable and dependable.
#9 The National Scenic Area Designation rally at
the Elk's Club was clearly defined as being
just that ~ an opportunity for those who support
the special designation to come together and
join forces, as was accurately reported in the
article. Instead of using the event to air
complaints from objectors, why don't they form
their own rally for that purpose?
|