Sedona.biz
The Internet Voice of Sedona

The Sedona Biz weekly print edition sent right to your INBOX! FREE!
Enter E-mail

Steve DeVol, President of Keep Sedona Beautiful
Sedona KSB President Steve DeVol addresses NSA Rally.

NSA Rally Packs Sedona Elks Club

More than 300 show support for National Area Scenic Designation

By Tommy Acosta

SEDONA, AZ (July 23, 2009) - Members of Keep Sedona Beautiful, the Sedona Sierra Club and the Democrats of the Red Rocks turned out in force Wednesday, July 22 to rally behind an effort to designate Sedona as a National Scenic Area.

More than 300 community members gathered at the Elks Club in Sedona to voice support for the designation, which would effectively and permanently ban land swaps between the federal government and other property owners, except within the designated scenic area itself.

One hundred sixty thousand acres of Coconino National Forest currently surround Sedona, The Village of Oak Creek, and Big Park.

They are protected from land trades by Amendment 12 but revisions to the current forest plan which protects the Sedona area against land trades is now underway and may be in place as early as 2011, according to D.O.R.R. A National Scenic Area designation would make the policy of no land trades within the Amendment 12 area permanent.

National Scenic Area Designation Rally in Sedona
More than 300 community residents attended NSA rally.

“The designation has only one purpose – to prevent land trades from outside the designated area for land inside the designated area,” said KSB President Steve DeVol. “That’s it!”

Opponents of an NSA designation for Sedona argue that it would create a new layer of government, affect private property rights and eliminate local control over forest land, which is presently controlled by the Forest Service under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Mr. DeVol contested the arguments.

“I’d like to make a couple of points of clarification this evening,” he said. “The scenic area designation does not bring a new layer of government. This is a myth. The Forest Service is administered by the US Department of Agriculture already and the management plan will remain the same. Control of the area will remain in local hands as it has been and will continue. Nothing changes. Except no land exchanges! Private property rights are not affected and are preserved. Private property can be bought and sold exactly as it is today.”

According to Mr. DeVol, the NSA Coalition is comprised of the Democrats of the Red Rocks, the Sierra Club Sedona-Verde Valley, and Keep Sedona Beautiful.

Angela LeFevre, President of the Democrats of the Red Rocks
D.O.R.R. President Angela LeFevre speaks on NSA.

He said they collected more than 3,500 statements of support urging Sen. John McCain, Senator Jon Kyl and Congresswoman Kirkpatrick to introduce the Sedona-Red Rock National Scenic Area legislation into Congress this year.

D.O.R.R. President Angela LeFevre noted that Senators McCain and Kyl have stated that they will support the bill when Representative Ann Kirkpatrick introduces it.

She said Rep. Kirkpatrick ran on a campaign promise to support an NSA designation and that D.O.R.R. delivered 6,000 votes for her in the last election.

She said her organization worked very hard to elect the congresswoman and she wondered why she was seeking input from the community to support the designation when she promised during the campaign she would support it.

“”So now we have Ann (Rep. Kirkpatrick) settled into life in Washington D.C. and our hopes are high,” she said of the election. “And we waited and we hear nothing. Ann was being curiously non-committal about the issue despite the fact that this had been a strong campaign promise of hers.”

Marlene Raynor, President of the Siera Club - Sedona-Verde Valley Chapter
Sedona Sierra Club President Marlene Raynor makes a point.

She said she was concerned as to why they now had to convince the congresswoman to support the NSA designation

“Why should we need to convince Ann of the necessity for an NSA when she has already pledged to support a designation?” she said. “We are all hoping that Ann will hear us and listen to our voices, honor the pledges she gave to the Democrats, Republicans and Independents here in the Sedona area that she would support an NSA designation.”

Joe Katz, Congresswoman Kirkpatrick’s press secretary, said the congresswoman is simply trying to get all sides of the story before moving forward.

“This is an issue that impacts many people in the area, and the congresswoman wants input from folks on both sides of the issue before moving forward,” he said. “Getting continued feedback from members of the community is extremely important to the legislative process, and will allow the congresswoman to make a better-informed decision on the next step.”

Ms. LeFevre said the NSA Coalition was formed to motivate Rep. Kirkpatrick to follow through.

“So D.O.R.R. formed a coalition with KSB and the Sierra Club,” she said. “We all have the same goal – to get Ann to introduce legislation that would designate this beautiful country here as a National Scenic Area.”

She said the congresswoman’s staff in May finally contacted her and that Rep. Kirkpatrick was now ready to look at the NSA issue and needed to start a “due diligence” process in order to get feedback on how everyone feels about the NSA designation and the impact such a designation would have on Greater Sedona.

“Please send your reasons why you support NSA to Ann before the end of the month,” she said. ‘July 31 is the deadline. Send your e-mails and letters. Let’s make sure that Ann hears us and we make this happen.”

Steve DeVol said the congresswoman needed additional facts to justify her introducing the legislation for the designation.

“Congresswoman Kirkpatrick has sent letters to some of you asking for additional information about why we should have the scenic area designation,” he said. “She is aware of the intrinsic value of preserving what is here but she wants additional arguments – facts -- that justify her introducing this legislation. What would be the financial impact of decreased tourism? Is there an endangered species in our forests? What would be the impact if additional development were allowed in the forest? Would additional development impact water availability or our waste treatment plant?

He said contacting elected officials on this was crucial.

We must encourage our elected officials to do the right thing,” he said. “Rep. Kirkpatrick needs to know and needs to hear that "the people" want this designation.”

Former Sedona Mayor Dick Ellis was there to show support as well.

“An NSA designation for Sedona is a win/win situation,” he said. “It cannot hurt us. It can only do us good. We have a great turnout here today. It shows the community is interested.”

Community activist Doug Blackwell said he was concerned only two members of the Sedona City Council, Mayor Rob Adams and Councilman Mark DiNunzio showed up at the rally.

“I’m amazed that the majority of the city council did not show up. It just goes to show how much they care about Sedona.”

Sedona Times publisher Rita Livingston commended the community for turning out in such large numbers.

“This is the largest meeting I’ve seen in a long time,” Ms. Livingston said. “It shows how deep the support of the community is for an NSA designation for Sedona.”

Mr. DeVol said action must be taken now to save the wonder of Sedona.

“The NSA designation will permanently preserve the land and our irreplaceable scenic beauty, small town character, and property values while enabling the community to provide needed schools, roads and other public necessities in the future,” he said. “We are at a crucial time in the development of Sedona. As the U.S. Forest Service begins its revision process for regional existing Forest Management Plans, public awareness of the facts and their involvement are crucial. We need to take action now. This is the best opportunity we have had in five years to finally get this done.”

 

Readers' comments

#1 I am in agreement with the coalition's agenda to keep Sedona unspoiled and pristine. I am not in aggreement as to how the agenda can be accomplished. Making the NSA designation permanent would effectively stop the city, county, and Forest control board from installing a bridge for an alternate route to Sedona from the Village of Oak Creek.
A private property owner has already installed a bridge and made it accessible to emergency equipment. Under an NSA designation will other private property owners be able to install bridges? Can anyone tell me if the NSA designation is passed, the governing bodies will be able to someday effect an alternate route? It is commendable that the coalition has such a large following and the show of support means that the citizenry is concerned about maintaining the beauty of Sedona. I would heartily support an NSA designation but the reality of sitting in traffic for over half an hour just to drive four miles to Sedona from the village keeps me from doing so.

#2 I find it difficult, if not impossible, to understand how the argument for an "alternative route" continues on ad infinitum. How long has the first respondent been in Sedona? If it wasn't a long time, didn't they do any research about the location of their residence in relation to highways, hospitals and fire stations before purchasing? Likewise, for those supporting "affordable dwelling units," "workforce housing," or whatever moniker the City gives it, didn't they research the economy, or how much of a salary they could make, or secure a job before moving, or the price of RENTALS? Why is it assumed that everyone who moves here wants to buy a house? Some people prefer renting.

For those who have lived here a long time and and who continuously want to add yet another "alternative route" (I believe there are multiple routes now), I would suggest moving to a more "urban" area instead of trying to create one here.

#3 Regarding the other comment, where has this person been for the last few years. It has been repeated over and over that the governmental agencies always have the ability to ask for Forest property for projects that demonstrate a community need. That can never go away, it is the TOWNSITE ACT and has been in existence for years. The District Forest Ranger has said so also. That ACT was used to get various properities in the area and has been in existence for years. Pay attention people, get the facts.
Bill Eich
Sedona

#4 No, the Scenic Designation will not prevent improvements such as an alternate route. Here is the section of the proposed legislation that addresses this issue:

(h) NO EFFECT ON SURROUNDING LAND- The establishment of the Scenic Area does not affect the management of-
(1) State, municipal, or private land located in the vicinity of the National Forest System land that is included in the Scenic area; or
(2) National Forest System land that is not included in the Scenic Area.

AND:

(j) NO EFFECT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT DISCRETION- The establishment of the Scenic Area does not affect the discretion of local governing bodies (including counties, municipalities, and fire and school districts) to seek assistance from the Secretary with respect to the resolution of local infrastructure and land use issues that involve National Forest System land within the Scenic Area.

Currently, any changes with the forest land uses (such as an alternate route) must comply with a NEPA Study. Under the Scenic designation, the same process will apply: a NEPA study must be conducted. In other words, new roads, hospitals, cell towers and/or schools are allowed.

Remember, the only thing the National Scenic designation does is prevent lands trades.

The proposed legislation can be found at:
http://www.keepsedonabeautiful.org/Proposed_NSA_Legislation.pdf

Steve DeVol

#6 I am very encouraged by this show of support for something we have all been needing for some time. I have written Ann Kirkpatrick personally urging she take tangible action on her campaign promise. I too felt she was somehow knuckling under to a minority of Red Rock News-influenced real estate interests fearing possible future observation and exposure. It's also nice to see the broadening support, joining often opposite forces in town to get this done NOW! By all means let's work together for once to benefit not only business and property owners today but future generations to come.

#7 I am commenter #1. In response to commenter #2, I will state that I am retired and I rent. I moved from an "urban" area 10 years ago. I am NOT trying to create anything. I do not want to be lumped together with all the other categories #2 has put me in. I know of only one route to Sedona from the Village. That is 179. Of course I could go through Cottonwood by way of Beaver Head Flats and Cornville or I could go up I-17 and come to Sedona on 89A. Or I could move somewhere else as #2 suggested because I obviously disagree with this person's opinion of how things should be. #2: Perhaps the reason you find it nearly impossible to understand my position is because you see it as an "arguement" (sic) instead of just another concerned citizen's opinion.

In response to commenter #4; Mr. DeVol, thank you for the information. I will look at the laws you have referenced and try to resolve my apprehensions concerning the NSA proposal.

#8 People need to understand that local control DOES matter and that under the Coconino Forest Plan we have effectively stopped land exchanges in the greater Sedona area. Only our own local diligence and involvement is going to protect us from land exchanges--not any "Act of Congress." The current District Ranger recently said that the Forest Plan now in final approval stage likely won't be re-opened for 20 years! That Forest Plan is a far more solid, dependable public policy than any bill out of Washington, D.C. If anyone thinks we should trust the 535 people in Congress (in BOTH parties) who take orders from their Party, not reading the bills, and watching the lobbyists and special interest run the place they've got to be kidding themselves. A bill passed this time can be reversed when the Congress flips to the other party. Or the bill can end up coming out with amendments and changes never expected by anybody--as they usually do. This Congress has become notorious for admitting they don't even know what's IN the bills they are passing. People, land exchanges are over-done-gone in this area. Many of us have strong suspicions about why NSA proponents are crying "WOLF!" about this but it's just not valid. There is no need for a new Federal power body here. Local control is accountable and dependable.

#9 The National Scenic Area Designation rally at the Elk's Club was clearly defined as being  just that ~ an opportunity for those who support the special designation to come together and join forces, as was accurately reported in the article. Instead of using the event to air complaints from objectors, why don't they form their own rally for that purpose?
 

 

Tell a friend about this page!
Their Name:
Their Email:
Your Name:
Your Email:

 

about us | privacy policy | advertise | bookmark this site

copyright © 2006 Sedona.biz