Dr. Melvyn Copen lives in Sedona, Arizona and has a second home in Atlanta Georgia. He is an educator and businessman who has worked and lived in many foreign countries and provides consulting services throughout the world. He is very active in local community activities. His column appears every other Friday in the Sedona.biz e-newsletter; and on their website. Please share your comments with him via email at melcopen@hotmail.com. For all of Mel's articles, please visit:
copencom.com
UNCOMMON SENSE - with MEL COPEN
Bringing sense to the census
by Melvyn Copen
SEDONA, AZ (November 19, 2009)
- A recent headline read: “Citizenship question
will not be added to 2010 census. The reason given
in this particular story is that asking that
question “could have led to significant undercounts
in states with large immigrant populations.” The
article went on to explain that this might result in
the loss of federal money and “congressional clout,”
since congressional seats are apportioned based on
population.
1837 saw the publication of Hans Christian
Anderson’s short story, “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” It was about
tailors who convince the emperor that they are selling him a wondrous
suit which is invisible to the incompetent. Unwilling to admit his
“incompetence,” the emperor buys the “garments” and wears them in a
parade. The spectators, knowing the story related to the suit, are
ashamed or afraid to say what their eyes see – all but one - an innocent
child who returns them all to reality when he says: “but he isn’t
wearing anything at all.” More than a century and a half later, the
lesson still hasn’t sunk in.
Those of you who, like me, are in a constant
wrestling match with the readout on the bathroom scale may relate to the
following pattern. After being “good” for a couple of days, something
comes up and you blow the diet. You know the morning news will be bad.
So what do you do to “correct” the situation? It’s easy! You skip the
weigh-in. That will teach that danged scale. But if you are like me,
in the sober light of day, you realize that not weighing in really
didn’t make a difference. The excesses of last night didn’t go away.
They’re still with you.
These two stories are quaint, and sound trivial,
except that seems to be the way government often works. Rather than
deal with issues, we ignore them or pretend they are not what they
really are. The military “don’t ask don’t tell” policy is a good
example. But there are many many more – and the census question is
another illustration. Let’s look at the two issues that were raised in
the newspaper story.
One concern is that if the question were asked,
states with high non-citizen populations would lose federal
revenues. This is not a trivial issue. In the case of Arizona, for
example, it was estimated that in 2007, illegal immigrants
represented 9% of the population. There are solutions to the
dilemma. If it is in nation’s best interest to provide funds based
on the number of people, regardless of status, then change the rules
for programs in which funding is based upon citizen counts. If it
is not in the nation’s best interests, then enforce the existing
regulations. But making this type of decision requires that members
of Congress stick their necks out – in defiance of the best of
congressional traditions. So if these issues are not to be
resolved, there is an easy way out - exempt the census counts from
consideration. At least that way we will still have some idea of
the magnitude of the issues relating to illegal immigration.
The second concern relates to the apportionment of
congressional seats. Once again, the same set of alternatives seems to
apply. If it is in the best interest of the nation to assure that
illegals are entitled to congressional representation, then count them.
If it is not, then don’t. A modification to the language of the 14th
amendment to the Constitution may be required. But once again, if we
can’t resolve the issues between now and the time of the census, then
exempt the census results from consideration. Congress has the power –
but even there, action is stymied by political risk. And since specific
household information is not shared with other government agencies,
reassurance to the respondents that there are no adverse consequences to
truthful replies (like deportation by the INS) must also be provided.
We just put the census in a separate status, given its importance to the
nation.
There is, however, another alternative. We can
just keep on yelling about the problems associated with illegal
immigration, devoid of hard facts. That certainly makes it easier to
take stands. It’s hard (or perhaps it’s easy) to refute a position
based on non-facts if all you are armed with is another set of
non-facts. But that seems to be characteristic (and perhaps
comfortable) for many of the modes in which government currently
functions. It also allows the media great latitude to “factulate” (a
word that I coined to cover the process of converting speculations into
facts). Much of today’s entertainment would go down the drain if we
changed, and all that we would have left is professional wrestling.
The issues relating to illegal immigration are
complex, and it is not my intent to delve into them here. But at the
very minimum, we need to ascertain the facts and then to base our
actions upon those facts. We need to find ways to enter into
constructive dialog. These issues have to be resolved, one way or
another. Ignoring them, I guess, is a way to achieve resolution, at
least temporarily, but it’s a very unsatisfying way. We need to address
issues in the light of what is best for the nation. Unfortunately, the
solution is often clouded by the desire of politicians to avoid personal
risk. (Perhaps term limits would take care of that problem.)
We need information. Too much of our energies
today are devoted to the questions surrounding illegal immigration,
and even though the nation’s economic woes have diminished the numbers
somewhat, the issue still remains and is likely to be back with us in
full force in the future. We cannot ignore realities. As distasteful
as it may be, we have to get on the bathroom scale, see where we are,
and then take appropriate action to deal with the issue. It doesn’t
matter that there is a diversity of opinions on what should be done.
Ignoring things does not make them go away, and as the Emperor learned,
failure to face reality, for whatever reason, can be embarrassing. This
nation has too many good people who are either silent on the issues or
vocal on their emotions. Facts, a desire to listen and engage in
constructive dialog, and willingness to compromise are what is needed.
About Mel
Dr. Melvyn Copen lives in
Sedona, Arizona and has a second home in Atlanta
Georgia. He is an educator and businessman who
has worked and lived in many foreign countries
and provides consulting services throughout the
world. He is very active
in local community activities. His column
appears every other Friday in the Sedona.biz
e-newsletter; and on their website. Please share your comments with him via
email at melcopen@hotmail.com.
SEDONA.BIZ COMMENTS: We have added a new way to post comments. You can post as a guest (the name you type-in will be displayed), you can login using your Twitter account login info, or you can sign up at Disqus.
To comment as a GUEST, type your comment, name, and
email. (only the name will be displayed).
Click on POST AS GUEST. If you have trouble posting, email editor@sedona.biz, and we'll help.