by Paul Gazda
VILLAGE OF OAK CREEK, AZ - (May 15, 2009) - Do you value
your health? Did you know some of your tax dollars
might fund the use of cancer causing chemicals in
your community?
In February, I met with the Transportation Committee
of the Big Park Regional Coordinating Council (BPRCC)
regarding the use of herbicides on the Highway 179
corridor landscaping.
As you may know, a special
improvement district was formed that includes all of
the Village of Oak Creek and most, if not all, of
the other neighborhoods represented by BPRCC.
My
purpose was to inform them of the potential cancer-causing
effects of standard herbicides and ask that the BPRCC send a letter to the county requesting only
non-toxic “EPA-exempt” herbicides be used for
landscape maintenance.
In case you are unaware of the scientific findings
on the hazards of standard herbicides, I will tell
you what I have found as a member of a Faculty
Senate committee to end herbicide use on the
Northern Arizona University campus. In a nutshell,
exposure to all the commonly used herbicides and
pesticides is linked to cancerous tumors,
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leukemia, genetic damage and
other diseases, with children and pregnant women
being most vulnerable.
[Jump]
[Continue] As if that were not enough, recent studies have
shown serious harm to the ecosystem results when the
cocktail of publicly- and privately-used herbicides
and pesticides combine in runoff water and end up in
our streams, rivers and ponds.
Clearly, the EPA has failed to provide adequate
protection in this regard. Recognizing this, many
cities in the U.S. and Canada have banned herbicides
and pesticides. Santa Fe, New Mexico banned
herbicides and pesticides on city property. Toronto,
Canada with a population of 2.5 million has
completely banned herbicides and pesticides for
government and private use.
The BPRCC discussed my request, but chose to take no
action.
Yavapai County has decided to ask for two types of
bids, one using standard toxic herbicides, and the
other using alternative non-toxic herbicides. My
concern is that, most likely, the bids with
non-toxic herbicides will cost more. Therefore, the
county will be inclined to go with the lowest bid,
ignoring public health aspects.
There is something you can do about it. If you value
your health, and the health of our community, it is
extremely important that you make your desires known
to Chip Davis and your BPRCC representatives. Let
them know that our health is worth something and
that we are willing to pay a little more for safe
chemicals to be used for Highway 179 landscape
maintenance.
This is not about a few chemically sensitive
individuals having allergic reactions. This is about
a serious public health issue. It is our money that
will be paying for the landscape maintenance. I, for
one, do not want to pay for the use of cancer
causing chemicals in my community. I hope you feel
the same.
Chip Davis can be contacted through the Yavapai
County website Board of Supervisors page “www.co.yavapai.az.us/bos.aspx”
and BPRCC can be contacted through “www.bigparkcouncil.org”.
Paul Gazda is a Sedona artist and member of Northern
Arizona University’s Faculty Senate Committee to end
herbicide use on the NAU campus.
Readers' comments
#1 Recently, the City of Sedona
decided to reverse their previous decision not
to use herbicides and pesticides for weed
killing and I'd like to know from this article's
author if the chemicals being used by the City
are the same as those being used on SR 179.
Also, I have a legal question as to whether or
not residents have any legal recourse against
such decisions in that carcinogens are being
used in public places.
#2 E-mails requesting reconsideration on the
Sedona herbicide issue may be sent to the mayor
and city council members via city clerk Cherry
Lawson at: clawson@sedonaaz.gov. Contacting
council members through the city clerk insures
that your comments go on public record. Be sure
to inform Cherry that you want your comments
distributed to all council members.