 |
|
Sedona resident Mark DiNunzio was chosen to
fill the open City Council seat vacated by
Marc Sterling. |
DiNunzio
named to fill Sterling council seat
By Tommy Acosta
SEDONA, AZ (July 3, 2009) - The Sedona City
Council at a special meeting held Thursday, July 2
chose Sedona resident Marc DiNunzio to fill the
empty-council seat vacated by former-council member
Marc Sterling.
The council voted 4-2 for Mr. DiNunzio, with Mayor
Rob Adams and Councilman Cliff Hamilton voting
against; councilors Dan Surber, John Bradshaw, Nancy
Scagnelli and Pud Colquitt voting for.
Due to the split vote, Councilor Colquitt attempted
to have the council approve DiNuzio’s selection by a
unanimous vote, in an effort to show unity.
Instead, Mayor Adams noted on record that he
supports DiNunzio’s nomination.
“It was a close call between Marc DiNunzio and Mike
Ward,” Mayor Adams said. “DiNunzio was my second
choice and Ward was my first. I did not vote for
DiNunzio simply because he was not my first choice.
Mike Ward's responses were more in depth and he
researched the hot topics.”
The council also interviewed former city
councilmember Jerry Frey, and Sedona residents Greg Ensminger and Mike Ward.
All four applicants were asked similar questions by
council members, questions that were given to them
prior to their appearance so they could be prepared.
Each interview was conducted with the applicants
individually so the others could not hear how each
responded.
Three citizens attended the interviews.
Questions ranged from how familiar the applicants
were with the budget; the manner in which they make
decisions; the weight public opinion has on their
decision-making process; issues the council has
failed to address; how their presence on the council
would affect civil relations between council
members; whether reserves should be tapped; and the
role of government in the community.
Mr. DiNunzio said his reason for seeking appointment
to the council rather than running in an election
was opportunity to make things better.
“It fits for me,” he said. “Tough times provide
opportunity. Through financial management we can
develop revenue streams and work to increase the
quality of life in our town.
In response to a question posed by Councilor
Scagnelli why he would be the most qualified to fill
Mr. Sterling’s seat he noted numerous similarities.
“We are both called Mark,” he quipped. “Marc is a
financial man. I am a financial man. He’s a
small-businessman. I’m a small businessman. He loves
Sedona. I love Sedona.”
Answering a question posed by Councilman Surber on
the criteria he would use in making tough decisions,
he said his approach would be data/information based
and he would consider numerous factors.
“It’s kind of like stirring soup,” he said. “We need
to ask -- Where are we now? Where do we want to go?
How do we get there? I seek out not just data but
information of all forms; the experience of other
cities. I would analyze it. Have the staff analyze
it and then come up with a scenario. I am led by
data but I keep in mind how it impacts people.
Public input added to the mix is critical as well.”
To a question posed by Councilor Hamilton on issues
he feels the city might be handling better or
differently, Mr. DiNunzio was supportive of the
council’s actions.
“My experience is the council is covering all
serious issues,” he said. “Everything is on the
table. I have no criticisms. We are all pulling on
the same end of the rope.”
Councilor Colquitt posed an especially-poignant
question on what the responsibility of a city
government has to its residents and the
responsibility of the residents to their government.
“We have a responsibility to turn over what we have
in as good or better condition to the next
generation,” he said. “How we make decisions impacts
the quality of life in our city. Our primary
responsibility is to be a beacon, to do the right
thing. If we do it right people will think they did
it themselves.”
Councilman Surber wanted to know how he felt about
funding social programs that are not the direct
responsibility of the city.
“I see the Chamber [of Commerce] and the
Film Festival as providing a return for the
community,” he said. “It is important for the
community to have an arts culture. But we have a
finite amount of dollars. We need to be staying on
top of these organizations, help them and move on.”
Councilor Hamilton wanted to know his position on
dipping into reserves to meet budget deficits.
“Finances ebb and flow,” he said. “We had a growth
path to service the community and now the reserves
are being dipped into. This is an opportunity to
look into this and see how we can make changes and
smart decisions.”
Mayor Adams asked if his being chosen to serve on
the council would add to the perceived divisiveness
in the council.
“I am not divisive,” he said. “I just want to focus
on the issues. We are what we are. We behave like we
behave. We have differences of opinion. It’s not
personal.”
He said controversy is a “strong disagreement of
opinions.”
“We must move past opinions to informed decision
making,” he said.
He was asked if he felt there was a “disconnect”
between the council and the community.
“I don’t think there is,” he said. “There is a lack
of information in the community. The council makes
decisions based on information. The public has
opinions not based on information.”
Councilor Scagnelli said a small, core group of the
same people turn out for council meetings, write the
letters and represent one-tenth of one percent of
the voting population in Sedona.
Councilman Surber said the problem with the
community is that people are put on one side or
another.
Councilor Scagnelli wanted to know what he would do
to bring others in.
“We need to brainstorm on this,” he said. “People
are living their private lives.”
He was asked how he would vote if individuals in the
audience were firmly against what he felt was right.
“It’s not about me,” he said. “It is about doing the
right thing for the community.”
Mr. DiNunzio admitted he had not been to a council
meeting in the past month. Applicants Mike Ward and
Jerry Frye have been attending council meetings
regularly.
Mayor Adams said that was a concern for him and a
factor in voting against picking Mr. DiNunzio for
the seat.
“He didn’t come to council meetings,” Mayor Adams
said. “That was my concern. The new council member
needs to hit the ground running and know the issues
they are addressing.”
In closing, Mr. DiNunzio spoke of his Sedona
experience.
“I love my life in Sedona,” he said. “It’s been good
to me. I like going to the store and spending an
extra-half hour talking to people that I know. I
want to continue to make my town better. That’s why
I am here.”
Editor’s Note: To see how the applicants who were
not chosen answered their questions, click on our
video of the selection process.
Readers' comments
#1 I don’t think there is,” he said. “There is a
lack of information in the community. The
council makes decisions based on information.
The public has opinions not based on
information.”
As a member of "The public", I resent this
elitist telling me my opinions are "not based on
information". DiNunzio should apologize to all
Sedonans or resign.
Next thing you know "The public" will be
considered too stupid to elect people.
(Actually, I think that just happened!}
Warren Woodward
#2 Dinunzio seems a straight shooter on this.
The truth is the public, myself included, seldom
have all the information and all of the sides to
an issue that the council members usually see in
their background packets. The manager and staff
have attempted to research matters and give the
Council all the information they can gather. The
people who show up all "stirred up" in the
audience (myself included but I rarely go) have
usually been given more narrow, even one-sided
information that supports their interest group's
agenda whatever it is. So then the stage is
set--it's US against THEM and forget about the
facts--and I've seen it happen time after time
when complete information is lacking on the
public's part. Very few of us have the time or
resouces to dig into this stuff. Sure, we've got
opinions and preconceived notions but we usually
get decisions from city council that have
weighed information, public opinion, costs and
impacts. The public has its say a LOT in Sedona
but mob rule is not the way to good government.
#3 If there is "obvious lack of information in
the community" speaks volumes about the lack of
communication exercised by our local government
and staff. Although there are many of us who do
strive and obtain as much information as we can
about various issues we still have serious
questions and reservations about the Council's
decisions and these should be discussed, rather
than summarily dismissed as is often the case.
If, as several Council members characterize that
the same 20-30 people show up for Council
meetings, Council members should be asking
themselves why this is the case and why aren't
more residents showing up at meetings, rather
than assuming that those 20-30 people represent
a small minority.
Council members statements about residents; not
having all of the information about issues, or
that the same people attend every meeting, or
declarations of a "shadow government," or
disbanding volunteer committees composed of
residents to resolve City issues, or ignoring
700 or so petitions against 76 traffic lights,
holding major meetings about major changes in
zoning and height ordinances in the summer
months when most people are away, or voting on
issues where they (the Council member) may
benefit in any way especially when that member's
or members' interests are known by the
residents, all result in fomenting distrust
among Sedona residents.
Anyone who runs and is elected to office needs
to remember they have are "public servants" and
as such, they need to recognize the obligation
to "educate" and to be "transparent" to the
public they serve.
Nancy Baer
[Home]
[News]
[Community] |