Home
News
Arts & Leisure
Sports
Business
Opinion
Dining
Gardening
Travel
Classifieds
Jobs
Community
Events
Forums
TV Listings
|
Community
 |
|
|
Signs stating support of Roberts,
such as "Fake Cops Rape, Rob and Kill!"
warned women to beware of those
impersonating a police office.
Roberts' supporters questioned the code of ethics of the
Yavapai County Sheriff's Dept and
expressed concern that a "blue wall" was protecting
the officer who arrested her. |
Supporters gather at Yavapai Superior
Court for Dibor Roberts
Sedona, AZ -
About 30 men and women gathered at the Yavapai
County Courthouse in Prescott, AZ on Monday, December 31 to
show their support for Dibor Roberts, the 47 year old woman
pulled over for speeding by a Yavapai County
Sheriff's officer in July 2007 around 11PM on Beaverhead Flats
Rd on her way home from her job at Sedona Winds.
The supporters
carried signs to show their support and concern that an officer for
the Yavapai County Sheriff's Office may have acted inappropriately in this situation.
Ms. Roberts
says she feared for her safety along the poorly lit stretch of road
in Cornville after hearing news reports that individuals were
impersonating police officers in Phoenix. She says she was
looking for a lighted area to pull over.
The Sheriff's Office contends that Ms.
Roberts failed to stop after multiple attempts to pull her over.
Roberts allegedly slowed from 65 to 50 mph but did not
pull over. In a
final attempt, the officer pulled in front of her car, and broke her
rear passenger window with his baton, before removing her from her
Nissan Sentra.
Ms. Roberts, who was unarmed and had no prior
arrest record, was handcuffed, and
spent 6 days
in jail. She is now awaiting trial on $20,000
bail.
Women in the community say they identify with
the fear she felt being followed on the dark
road and believe that the officer should have
followed her to a lighted area. One of the signs
said "Women Beware. This Could Happen to You!"
Supporters believe the officer used unnecessary
and excessive force which violates the Yavapai
County Sheriff's Office Code of Ethics. Some of
the supporters questioned why the officer did
not have backup at the scene before he stopped
her. Roberts was charged with fleeing and
resisting arrest. An assault charge was dropped
earlier.
At the December 31 Case Management
Conference, February 4 was set as the date for
the pre trial conference and April 29 was set
for the beginning of a three day trial.
Citizen opinions (submit your opinion
to editor@sedona.biz on
the Dibor Roberts case and we'll post it here)
#1 As an African American woman, I am very
concerned about the Dibor Roberts case. I feel as though I have
been put on notice by the Yavapai County Sheriff’s Department.
Driving on Beaverhead Flat Road is no longer a beautiful,
comfortable drive for me at any time of the day or night. It
seems to me that the officer’s actions toward Dibor Roberts were
inappropriate; breaking out the rear window of her car, taking
her cell phone from her so that she could not call her husband
in the dark of night, throwing her to the ground and putting his
knee in her back to handcuff her – all for alleged charges of
speeding 10 miles over the speed limit and trying to get to a
well lit area before stopping. And, as if that were not enough,
she was thrown in jail for 6 days. All women in Yavapai County
have been put on notice. But, as an African American woman,
having experienced racial and gender injustice in America, this
case is frightening. I pray that the courts will be just with
Mrs. Roberts. I know Dibor Roberts and she deserves nothing less
than justice. - SPN
#2 “Damage Control”
After attending the January 15th “press conference” called by Yavapai County Sheriff Waugh, I have questions.
First, how much more money are taxpayers going to be charged to
defend the arrest of Dibor Roberts on July 29, 2007?
Second, is it usual and customary for a Sheriff to call a “press
conference” to explain and defend the actions of one of his
officers?
Third, as the Sheriff stated this situation has “snowballed into
something unfortunate,” why has he not used his position to stop
the snowball?
Fourth, if the traffic stop was, again in the exact words of
Sheriff Waugh, “just a traffic violation,” why has Dibor Roberts
been charged with two felonies instead of being issued a traffic
ticket? Also, when does a traffic violation necessitate spending
six days in jail and a $20,000 bond?
Fifth, Sheriff Waugh said, “Of the County’s forty thousand
traffic stops, this is the first one resulting in this kind of
situation.” One in forty thousand tells me there was an obvious
problem with this particular stop. Should Sheriff Waugh question
what went wrong with this one in forty thousand stop?
Sixth, Sheriff Waugh said his Sergeant had to forcefully stop
Dibor Roberts before she became a potential danger by entering a
“highly populated area.” Did the Sergeant consider the town of
Cornville a highly populated area? The Sergeant forced Mrs.
Roberts’s car to the side of the road just after the
intersection of Beaverhead Flat and Cornville Roads.
Seventh, if the Sergeant made the stop “by the book” as the
Sheriff claimed, why did the officer pull his service revolver
and why did the Sheriff omit this significant detail as he told
the County’s version of the traffic stop/arrest? When stopping
someone for speeding, is it “by the book” to draw a gun and use
a baton to break the window of the person’s car?
Finally, if the forced stop was justified to protect the safety
of others in “highly populated” Cornville, why did the officer
also risk his safety and that of a citizen by a) not running the
license plate of the car, b) not calling for back-up and c)
forcibly stopping a “suspect” in a dark area?
I believe it is time for the County to dismiss the charges
against Dibor Roberts for the second time (Judge Sterling
dropped all charges against Mrs. Roberts on November 2, 2007).
The County could also use this situation to create a positive
outcome – the creation of a “universal signal” for citizens to
use (perhaps turning on the car’s emergency flashers) to convey
their desire to continue to a lighted area before stopping.
It is time for the County to stop defending their actions and
for Mrs. Roberts to be cleared of unjustifiable felony charges.
It is time for all of us to be able to feel safe driving in the
dark and to have faith that our law enforcement officers are
acting to protect us from actual criminals.
Mary M.
#3 This is outrageous! Our law enforcement officers need to be made
to understand on no uncertain terms that this type of reckless
and aggressive behavior is not acceptable. Jeff Neunum should be
disciplined and Sheriff Waugh should apologize.
John d.
[Home Page]
[News Home Page]
[Back to Community Page]
|